David Sacks

David Sacks 转发了 原作者 的帖子，并评论：Some people are saying。被转发帖子的内容是：Anthropic very publicly claiming there needs to be a crackdown on distillation is puzzling. It's a ~$1T company with incredible resources and the "distillation attacks" at the scale they describe would seem easy to detect. Only cost would be giving up the associated API revenue.

David Sacks 转发了 原作者 的帖子，并评论：Mark Zuckerberg gets it right: “The defining question of our age isn’t whether superintelligence will exist, but who will have access to it. Will it be centralized and restricted to a few institutions, or will it be a tool that empowers everyone?” Concentration of power is the。被转发帖子的内容是：I wrote about why we believe the future is for everyone. More coming about a positive vision for a world with superintelligence soon.

David Sacks 转发了 原作者 的帖子，并评论：Anthropic maintains that it is entitled to train for free on all the world’s output, even if the author objects. But if a competitor trains on Anthropic’s output after paying for it, that is IP theft. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.。被转发帖子的内容是：btw anthropic's internal document on this literally said "we don't want it to be known that we are working on this.” it was called project panama. here's exactly what happened: 1: anthropic concluded that books were the cheapest way to build a world-class model because they x.com/HedgieMarkets/…

Narrative violation. WSJ today.

The entire tech industry (save for Anthropic) has come out in favor of open source AI. So what happens next? Will Anthropic change its lobbying efforts? Not likely. Now the gaslighting begins: “Nobody is trying to ban open source.” “We just want to limit who can use it.” “We just want to limit who can contribute to it.” “We just want to limit how powerful those models can be.” “We just want to make sure the guardrails (we lobbied for) can’t be removed.” The net effect will be the same. They won’t stop until they kneecap open source. The rest of the industry needs to watch these guys like a hawk.